Showing posts with label TUNG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TUNG. Show all posts

Friday, 26 June 2015

Short Selling Statistics (UK) - When to go long...

Disclaimer: I don't have a licence to give financial advice, so don't view any of the bewlow content as thus.


THIS POST IS UPDATED PERIODICALLY WITH MORE DATA AND ANALYSIS!


Morning (01/07/2015),


I've put together some statistics regarding well known short positions across multiple sectors in UK markets. This data can be used to help determine the levels at which investors could consider going long on other stocks in similar positions.



Known Issues:


1. Historic market capitalisation levels are calculated using the latest shares in issue figures (clearly this number can change and for companies under short pressure I would argue that this is more likely to change than for companies that are not in the same position).


2. I have excluded well known shorted companies that have had the positions taken out as hedges against other positions - the positions I have chosen are aggressive short positions.


3. Data errors can exist and although I have tried to avoid them as much as possible people should be aware of them.


4. Some of the shorts listed below are still active, which means that if another down leg takes place (past the share price low in the below data) then this data will all change.


5. There really need to be hundreds of data points to give a really solid study - so view this as only rough.



Company Market Cap Peak/£bn Share Price High Share Price Low Percentage change/%

Mean Fall/% Mean Fall Companies under £1bn MCap Peak/% Mean Fall Companies Over £1bn MCap Peak/%
Quindell
3.036852
682.50
24.10
-96.47

-68.3010826720286
-74.5074087409454
-65.1979196375702
Tungsten Corp
0.513867475
409.75
52.488
-87.1902379499695




Tullow Oil
14.6821707
1611
278.10
-82.7374301675978




Afren
1.89171248
170.80
1.28
-99.2505854800937




BooHoo
0.626144975
55.75
21
-62.3318385650224




Plus500
0.8972909
781
198
-74.6478873239437




Sainsbury
8.2264596
428
221.10
-48.3411214953271




WM Morrison 8.056.095
345
150.6
-56.3478260869565




Carillion
1.7397029
404.3
294.025
-27.2755379668563




Ashmore Group
3.04106961
429.9
249
-42.079553384508




Nanoco
0.471046245
199.275
83.155
-58.271233220424




Lancashire Holdings
1.8493926
933.00
506
-45.7663451232583




Ocado Group
3.66998335
623.5
216.8
-65.2285485164394




Monitise
1.7903459
82.75
9.53
-88.4833836858006




Blinkx
0.9445401
234.75
23.25
-90.0958466453674







I intend to update this post with graphs confirming or denying any correlations between the peak market capitalisation level and the mean fall of stocks that are being short sold.




Analysis:


1. The mean percentage fall suggests that for companies that are in a bear environment, long positions should be avoided until the company has fallen by at least 50% if you are a buy and hold investor prepared to top up on the way down.



2. Be aware that as you reach the point when you should consider going long, average daily volumes are likely to increase in conjunction with intra-daily price volatility, as short positions exit and long or volatility traders move in and out on swings.



3. Although the data above only gives one example of this, it is generally notable that companies with lower floated share prices fall less under short pressure (I image that this is to do with the implied extra volatility per every 1p change that exists - each penny change in the share price carries more significance for company's value).



4. Statistical Analysis:


- Before you read this, it should be noted that I am not a statistician or mathematician.



- If we have a look at correlations in the data, the Pearson Correlation Coefficients for the data sets (Peak Market Cap vs Percentage Fall) look like this:


Companies Valued Over 1Bn: R= -0.1506

Companies Valued Under 1Bn: R= -0.4886

All Companies: R= -0.0435



- This works between -1 (negative correlation) and +1 (positive correlation). The closer the number is to 0, the weaker the relationship.



- I don't feel that I can safely comment on this data fro reasons I will place in my evaluation, but the data is there for people who find it useful.




- The mean data for share price falls in the table above does suggest however that larger companies (peaking over £1bn in valuation) do fall less than smaller ones (under the peak £1bn market cap).



Evaluation:


This study does sadly have some rather large holes in it:


1. The data sample is very small - 15 companies out of the 1231 companies listed on the LSE (excluding Venture Capital Trusts and Investment Trusts) is hardly a fair study.


- This being said manually sourcing data is hard and time consuming and added to this in the grand scheme of things, there aren't a vast number of short positions over the 2.5% threshold I used (many short positions are merely intended to hedge long positions and can be quite small). Therefore, you could argue that this 2.5% threshold helps to limit the sample size issues.

- It is also worth noting that newer companies are unlikely to quickly build up shorts of over 2.5%, which realistically brings this total sample size down again.



2. There are so many possible variables that I would question if knowing R values is really that useful.

- Also, there are twice as many larger companies in this data set than smaller companies, which again brings into question knowing about the R values and the mean values



Conclusion:


Regardless of the issues with this little study, I think that I personally have learned to avoid trading companies with shorts over 2.5% on the long side until a fall from the peak market cap has been achieved of 50% (across all companies). For smaller companies it does seem that looking for around a 75% fall is sensible, but on balance I would rather trust the larger data set for companies valued at over £1bn.


Enjoy,


The Masked Stock Trader



Friday, 1 May 2015

Swing Trade Portfolio (New Year)

Here is where I will be posting my track record for the main technical swing trade portfolio that I manage (note that I publish/have published technical analysis reports for all of the below trades):


Company/EPICBuy DateSell DateTrade Gain or Loss/%
QPP8/12/201412/3/20152.880232384
TUNG12/3/201531/3/157.18887598
WSG31/3/1521/4/157.605917992
GKP21/4/15Active TradeActive Trade
GLEN11/5/2015Active TradeActive Trade
TCG11/5/2015Active TradeActive Trade

Monday, 13 April 2015

Free Weekly UK Technical Analysis 13/04/2015

DISCLAIMER: I am not FCA authorised or authorised in any sense to give financial advice. Do not regard any of the following links, or information as investment or trading advice.


N.B. Currently FireFox does not support Google Drive and therefore these reports may not open.


This Week's Analyses:

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0wd9XTIWftmfnFpOVFMZlljaDRBSVNaTzEtZURmVlg4QlFKSkN6WExqMUJRczBBMGdUVU0&usp=sharing

How to use these reports:



More information regarding this project can be found here:


Wednesday, 8 April 2015

Free UK Technical Analysis 08/04/2015

DISCLAIMER: I am not FCA authorised or authorised in any sense to give financial advice. Do not regard any of the following links, or information as investment or trading advice.


N.B. Currently FireFox does not support Google Drive and therefore these reports may not open.


Today's Analyses:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0wd9XTIWftmfnMtRURPOWZVQlluT1FHQ2NaVnJPR1RFQ0NYV1UwOFBhNXNlUHF6TlRJRFE&authuser=0

How to use these reports:



More information regarding this project can be found here:


Friday, 13 March 2015

Tungsten Corp PLC Technical Analysis For 16/03/15

I have to disclaim that I hold a small long position in the low 170p range in Tungsten Corp (TUNG) as of 12/03/15 and I have no licence to give financial advice, so do not view this as advice.



  • Support sits at 170p gap level (09/03/15) and has been tested twice since the gap up. I am looking to place stops below this around the 167/168 level (waiting to check for a rebound upwards if 170p is hit on the asking price).



  • Short term resistance is found at 180p (tested today this week -13th) and then at 200p. The move through 190p on Wednesday illustrates a lack of any significant resistance at that level.



  • The movement through the 50 level on the slow stochastic oscillator suggests building momentum towards the upside and in conjunction with this, the consolidating short term moving averages (3, 5, 8 and 13) post the drop on the 24th February suggests we're consolidating for a few days prior to another move towards the upside.



  • Stochastic Oscillators are useful with stocks just out of price shocks, because the were designed to be operated within chaotic systems.



  • The five day moving average (174.65p) is moving toward the twenty day moving average at (176.43), which (if crossed) will be another posiutve sign of further upwards momentum to be had. 



  • In combination with this, the ten day moving average at 166.33p on further upwards momentum will provide a move through the twenty day moving average over the coming days on positive volume to the upside.

  • The British Bulls system placed a buy signal on TUNG at the close of 06/03/15, and the hold of the 170p level still makes their pick a valid trade to hold in the short to medium term, at least until the reason for the trade is made invalid: https://www.britishbulls.com/SignalPage.aspx?lang=en&Ticker=TUNG.L



  • Fundamentally, the share purchases from Edmund Truell suggest not only a very high level of confidence moving forwards, but moreover a desire to reduce the free float through his use of leveraged CFDs, placing more restrictions on short parties in the market to be able to reduce without causing squeezes in the market.



  • Margin calls here seem highly unlikely as a result of his other financial interests elsewhere: 22.79 per cent. of the issued share capital in IFG Group plc, 48.19 per cent. of the equity of Miura (Holdings) Ltd, interests in CLOs and Permira, etc.


The Masked Stock Trader

Thursday, 12 March 2015

Long Tungsten Corp (12/03/2015)

UPDATE (21/03/2015):


  • I decided that my trade was still valid as long as a fall below the gap level at 160 (09/03/2015) didn't occur. 
  • Thankfully, combined with this the support at 160p, we saw a comfortable bounce off of these levels and back to 186p - currently making me a 12p per share profit.
  • There's now very little resistance at the 190p level and although there does sit some at the 200p level, the more significant resistance comes in at around the 210p level.
  • With Numeric having closed a large proportion of their short position (1.31% to 0.14%), this is another reason to remain bullish on Tungsten Corp.



  • Intra-daily, the movement of the 3 day moving average through the 13 day moving average has provided a long trade for me, which I would look to exit from either intra-daily around the 180 level or at around the 190 mark if I decide to take over night exposure.
  • The test and hold of the 170p support line this morning is another reason to turn bullish.
  • Resistance levels sit at the 190p level and I will be reconsidering the trade and may exit the trade on a drop to the 170p level or below.



Quant System Output:


# Signals
Buy - 7.3477575566605554377849732373 - 5 day SMA crossed 13 day SMA
Buy - 7.7396316536415948509879072226 - 8 day SMA crossed 13 day SMA

# Comments
SMA 3 - 177.75 (173.08333333333333333333333333)
SMA 5 - 171.10 (164.95)
SMA 8 - 165.625 (162.6875)
SMA 13 - 165.25 (167.50)
SMA 21 - 182.52380952380952380952380952 (184.27380952380952380952380952)
SMA 34 - 197.97794117647058823529411765 (199.73529411764705882352941176)
SMA 55 - 223.94090909090909090909090909 (226.10454545454545454545454545)
SMA 89 - 239.09269662921348314606741573 (240.64606741573033707865168539)
SMA 144 - 279.140625 (280.34895833333333333333333333)
SMA 233 - 274.57806866952789699570815451 (274.83557939914163090128755365)